You are one of the leading editors of Henry Moore. His article has been nomninated at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Henry Moore.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 21:43, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for not using the official notification before. Henry Moore has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 05:16, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are one of the leading editors of Blue, which has been listed at WP:FAR. Please follow the discussiona at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Blues and consider helping out.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 05:18, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. - auburnpilot talk 02:32, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 19:28, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't the relevance determined by readers and administrators - I believe the information to be relevant. Also, if you go to Premiership for rugby, on Wikipedia the page is called Guinness Premierships 9for sponsorship reasons) and there is a sponsorship section under Premier League football:

Sponsorship

Since 1993, the Premier League has been sponsored. The sponsor has been able to determine the league's sponsorship name. The list below details who the sponsors have been and what they called the competition:

   * 1993–2001: Carling (FA Carling Premiership)
   * 2001–2004: Barclaycard (Barclaycard Premiership)
   * 2004–2007: Barclays (Barclays Premiership)
   * 2007–2010: Barclays Premier League [24]

So, I would really like it if the sponsorship section i have added to The Ashes page is left, it is after all, as the logo states, called 'The npower Ashes Series 2009' I think sponsorship is of great interest to many people, and I am one of them! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wallerina (talk • contribs) 18 November 2008

Yes, whether the content stays is determined by a consensus of readers. I am a reader. Three separate readers have now removed it as irrelevant in the current form. I opened a discussion on The Ashes talk page. --RobertG ♬ talk 11:46, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The Messiaen recordings which I posted are from Imeem.com which has agreements with record companies allowing sharing of certain recordings. The record companies receive a portion of Imeem's advertising revenues in exchange. Not all music posted on Imeem can legally be shared but the ones I posted can be. For instance Louise Bessette's recording of Les Vingt Regards is posted on Imeem but cannot be shared. John Ogden's recording can be shared in part. Terrence.Maguire (talk) 18:05, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]