Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Indian J Med Res. 2010 Nov; 132(5): 489–503.
PMCID: PMC3028942
PMID: 21149997

Botulinum toxin: Bioweapon & magic drug

Abstract

Botulinum neurotoxins, causative agents of botulism in humans, are produced by Clostridium botulinum, an anaerobic spore-former Gram positive bacillus. Botulinum neurotoxin poses a major bioweapon threat because of its extreme potency and lethality; its ease of production, transport, and misuse; and the need for prolonged intensive care among affected persons. A single gram of crystalline toxin, evenly dispersed and inhaled, can kill more than one million people. The basis of the phenomenal potency of botulinum toxin is enzymatic; the toxin is a zinc proteinase that cleaves neuronal vesicle associated proteins responsible for acetylcholine release into the neuromuscular junction. As a military or terrorist weapon, botulinum toxin could be disseminated via aerosol or by contamination of water or food supplies, causing widespread casualties. A fascinating aspect of botulinum toxin research in recent years has been development of the most potent toxin into a molecule of significant therapeutic utility. It is the first biological toxin which is licensed for treatment of human diseases. In the late 1980s, Canada approved use of the toxin to treat strabismus, in 2001 in the removal of facial wrinkles and in 2002, the FDA in the United States followed suit. The present review focuses on both warfare potential and medical uses of botulinum neurotoxin.

Keywords: Botulism, botulinum toxin, Clostridium botulinum, neurotoxin, proteinase

Introduction

Clostridium botulinum and botulism, the disease it causes, have been known to man for centuries1. Botulism is a severe neuroparalytic disease caused by the action of botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) produced by anaerobic spore-forming C. botulinum and some of its close relatives2. The BoNTs are regarded as the most potent toxins known to mankind3. If left untreated, a severe case of botulism leads to death of the patient due to paralysis of respiratory muscles. Although the disease has been known to man since ancient time, Muller in 1870 coined the name ‘botulism’ for the newly described disease4. Following the advent of microbiology in the late 19th century, the causative organism was isolated from contaminated meat and recognized as an anaerobic bacillus5. Cultivation of the bacillus and its subsequent introduction into animals leading to development of the symptoms of botulism has been reported6.

One of the most fascinating aspects in the field of botulinum toxin research in recent years has been application of the most potent toxin in treatment of neurological disorders. It has become the first biological toxin which is licensed as drug for treatment of human diseases. As of January 2008, two BoNT serotypes (A and B) are approved for clinical use in the United States by Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Subsequently, the neurotoxin has become a household name as clients line up at local gyms, parties, and spas for Botox injections, in order to temporarily rid themselves of wrinkles and sweaty armpits. This review provides updated information on warfare potential and medical uses of botulinum neurotoxin.

Botulism: Disease

All four forms of botulisms (food borne, infant, wound and animal) cause illness through a common pathway regardless of the manner in which the toxin gains systemic access7. Botulism initiates with acute weakness of muscles, causing difficulty in speaking and swallowing and double with blurred vision in all forms of diseases. This is followed by a progressive symmetrical flaccid paralysis, descending from the muscles of the head and throat, which in severe cases causes death due to respiratory muscles paralysis8. Mental functioning is not impaired by BoNTs, so the patient remains alert and conscious throughout the disease9. Botulism is confirmed by detection of BoNT in a patient’s serum or stool, or in a sample of food consumed before onset of illness10.

Food-borne botulism is also known as “classical” botulism, as it was the first form of the disease described in literature. Food poisoning due to botulinum toxin emerged as a problem when food preservation became a widespread practice. BoNT is secreted in to food by toxigenic clostridia growing in it under suitable conditions. Ingestion of preformed toxin is responsible for the botulism thus this type of disease represents intoxication rather than an infection, which is the case of other form of human botulisms. In a study of 2622 outbreaks in which BoNT types were determined, 34 per cent were caused by type A, 52 per cent by type B and 12 per cent by type E. Only two food borne outbreaks were assigned to BoNT type F during this period11. More than 90 per cent cases of foodborne botulism have been reported due to home prepared or home preserved foods9. A wide variety of commercially produced (preserved and non-preserved) foods have caused botulism outbreaks. Examples include foil-wrapped baked potatoes12, canned chili sauce13, jarred peanuts14, packed food15, hazelnut yogurt16, garlic in oil17, carrot juice18, and matambre (Argentine meat roll)19.

Infant botulism, recognized as a clinical identity over three decades ago20, has been the most diagnosed form of botulism in USA since 197921. The initial neurological symptoms of infant botulism are largely the same as in other forms of botulism, but these are usually missed by parents and doctors because the infant can not verbalize them. The case/fatality ratio among hospitalized patients was reported to be less than one per cent22. The source of spores for most cases remains unknown, although the most common sources of infection for infants appear to be honey and environmental exposure23,24. Analysis of infant botulism cases occurring globally from 1996 through 2008 revealed 524 cases in 26 countries representing five continents25.

Another form of botulism is analogous to tetanus, in that BoNT is determined from C. botulinum growing in vivo in abscessed wounds called wound botulism. Most cases occur in physically active young males who are presumable at higher risk of traumatic injuries22. Wound botulism has emerged as a small-scale epidemic in San Francisco, USA, among Bay Area drug abusers following subcutaneous injection of heroin26. Similarly, in the United Kingdom, bacterial infections (particularly wound botulism) have increased markedly since 2000 among injecting heroin users27. Some cases have also been reported in Germany28 and in Sweden, where real-time PCR was used to diagnose a case of type E wound botulism29. The case / fatality ratio has been rather high (15%)9.

Most mammals are susceptible to botulinum neurotoxin and develop botulism with similar clinical features to humans3032. A majority of cases are caused by C. botulinum group III, although groups I and II are also reported in animal botulism31. Horses are very sensitive to BoNTs and equine botulism occurs sporadically worldwide, both as feed poisoning and as toxico-infectious forms31. Avian botulism is usually caused by BoNT type C1, to which most birds seem to be susceptible. Botulism is very dangerous in fish farming33. Contaminated silage has been reported to cause botulism outbreaks among cattle34.

Inhalational botulism is not a natural form of botulism and most likely to be seen on the battlefield, is rare. One incident involving accidental exposure of humans to BoNT/A in a laboratory of Germany was reported in 196135. More data are available on exposure of animals to toxin aerosols. Rhesus monkeys were exposed by inhalation to BoNT/A, in conjunction with toxoid and hyperimmune globulin efficacy trials36. Park and Simpson37 reported that BoNT/A, an inhalation poison, works by the active process of binding and transcytosis across airway epithelial cells.

Iatrogenic botulism is caused inadvertently by injection of botulinum toxin for therapeutic or cosmetic reasons38. Four cases of iatrogenic botulism occurred in December 2004 in Florida following cosmetic injection with a botulinum toxin that was not approved for use in humans39.

Botulism in Indian scenario

Food-borne botulism is thought to be an uncommon clinical condition in India and is rarely reported. First incidence of food borne botulism in India was reported in 1996 involving 34 students with two deaths and toxigenic C. butyricum was isolated40. Two patients of one family (42 yr old man and his 6 yr old daughter) consumed canned meat products were diagnosed clinically according to CDC guidelines as botulism41. Dhaked et al42 isolated toxigenic clostridia from soil of slaughter house, of which one was confirmed by PCR and mouse protection assay as C. botulinum type E. Prevalence and distribution of C. botulinum was also studied in fish from coastal and inland areas of India. Types A to D were found to be present on sediments, surface of wild fish and intestine with dominance of C. botulinum type C and D43,44. Recently, multiplex PCR for the detection of C. botulinum and C. perfringens toxin genes was reported on eight suspected food borne botulism cases45.

Clostridium botulinum: Bacterium

Bacteria isolated from the outbreaks of the beginning of the century were not all similar to the Van Ermengem’s strain46. The clinical manifestations of the intoxication were all alike, but the cultural characteristics and growth requirement of different isolates differed. By cross neutralization tests of their respective toxins the different C. botulinum isolates were divided into two types, A and B47. Bacteria were also isolated from animal botulism cases in 1920 and were designated as type C48 and D49. Thereafter, a serotype E was isolated from fish food50. Moller & Scheibel51 isolated serotype F and Gimenez & Ciccarelli52 serotype G, respectively from a Danish patient and Argentinean soil. Thus, seven distinct serotypes of botulinum toxin have now been isolated, designated A through G. That means one serotype has been isolated approximately every 12 years since Van Ermengem’s original isolation. Serotypes A, B, E and F have been clearly identified in numerous human poisoning episodes. Serotype G has only been identified in a few outbreaks. Serotypes C and D have been found in outbreaks involving various animals. Why humans are typically not poisoned by serotypes C and D is not clear.

Early chromosomal DNA-DNA homology studies53 showed that the single species decision did not hold up to modern nucleic acid based taxonomical scrutiny and later C. botulinum was divided into three groups I to III54. This decision was validated through 16S ribosomal RNA sequence analysis5557. The non-disease forming serotype G52, found at the time of grouping was termed as C. botulinum group IV by Smith & Hobbs58, but has subsequently been given a species name of its own, Clostridium argentinens59. It has been recognized that the botulinum neurotoxins are produced by four distinct groups of C. botulinum based on cultural and biochemical properties or DNA-DNA homology. However, in 1986, it was demonstrated that two clostridial species other than C. botulinum produced botulinum toxin in three cases of infant botulism, two in Rome, Italy60 and one in New Mexico61. Type BoNT/E producing C. butyricum was isolated from the cases in Rome and BoNT/F producing C. baratii from the infant botulism case in New Mexico. Generally a single organism expresses a single toxin type but some strains of C. botulinum are also reported to be capable of producing mixtures of two types of toxin, such as A+F, A+B or B+F2. In addition, strains that possess unexpressed, ‘silent’ genes have also been reported62.

Whole genome sequences of various C. botulinum strains along with their plasmids are available in the GenBank depositories. Total 17 C. botulinum complete genomes have been sequenced (till Oct, 2009), which include representatives of all the serotypes excepting C. botulinum type G6368. These genomes provide an excellent opportunity for comparative analysis of C. botulinum and will undoubtedly provide valuable insights into the pathogenicity, metabolic diversity and evolution of these organisms.

Botulinum neurotoxins

Botulinum neurotoxins are the most poisonous poison known to the humankind produced by strains of C. botulinum. The lethal dose for a person by the oral route is estimated at 30 ng69, by the inhalational route 0.80 to 0.90 µg, and by the intravenous route 0.09 to 0.15 µg38. Assuming an average weight of 70 kg each of 5.6 billion people, only 39.2 g of pure BoNT would be sufficient to eradicate humankind22. Due to their absolute neurospecificity these neurotoxins do not react with any substrates in the presynaptic motor neurons, BoNTs are extremely toxic17. The two most likely mechanisms for use of botulinum toxin as a terrorist weapon include deliberate contamination of food or beverages or via an aerosol release71.

In type A, three different sized progenitor toxins with molecular masses of 900 kDa (19 S, LL toxin), 500 kDa (16 S, L toxin) and 300 kDa (12 S, M toxin) were observed7274. Types B, C and D strains produce both 16 S and 12 S toxins, whereas types E and F produce 12 S toxins and type G produces only 16 S toxin75. Therefore, it was postulated that 19 S and 16 S toxins have both haemagglutinin (HA) and non-toxin non-haemagglutin (NTNH) proteins whereas 12 S toxin is formed by association of NTNH protein only.

The neurotoxin is released as a single polypeptide chain of 150 kDa, which is later nicked to generate two disulphide linked fragments, the heavy chain (H, 100 kDa) and light chain (L, 50 kDa) (Fig.). The H chain is responsible for binding, internalization and membrane translocation, whereas L chain for target modification in the cytosol76. The function of L chains has been established as zinc dependent endopeptidases77, and the substrates are one of the three proteins of the docking complex responsible for release of acetylcholine from synaptic vesicles. Light chain of types A, C and E acts on SNAP 257881 and VAMP/ synaptobrevin is cleaved by BoNT B, D, F and G along with tetanus neurotoxin77,79,8284 whereas syntaxin is cleaved by BoNT/C85,86. BoNT is internalized in cholinergic nerve endings and remain in the presynaptic motor neurons causing flaccid paralysis76.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJMR-132-489-g001.jpg

The di-chain structure of a botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A). Botulinum neurotoxins are ~150-kDa proteins, synthesized as single-chain polypeptides and post-translationally nicked to form di-chain molecules. They share the same domain architecture and overall structure. The light and heavy chains of BoNT/A are linked by a single disulphide bond, Cys430–Cys454. The light chain, shown in red, functions as zinc-dependent endopeptidase. The heavy chain comprises two functional domains of roughly equal size. The N-terminal section, shown in blue, is the translocation domain and is thought to be involved in translocation and activation of the LC. The C-terminal section, shown in green, is acting as binding domain.

Characterization and detection of Clostridium botulinum and their toxins

Basic principal of detection and isolation of C. botulinum from clinical, food and environmental samples has remained essentially unchanged since E Van Ermengem’s first report, more than a century ago5. Isolation of C. botulinum almost invariably starts with anaerobic enrichment of the samples in a non selective culture media87, e.g. Robertson cooked meat medium (CMM) or trypticase-peptone-yeast extract-glucose (TPYG) broth for 3-10 days at 26-35°C. Usually culture are heat (70°C for 10 min) or ethanol treated (50 % for 1 h) prior to plating to get rid off vegetative cells which greatly improves subsequent isolation88. Although selective media89 for C. botulinum have been developed, their use has remained limited. The efficiency of selection in the media has been questioned90, since antibiotics used seems to inhibit some strains of type E and to alter the appearance of type G colonies91.

The optimal and minimal growth temperatures for group I strains is 35-40 and 10°C, for group II strains 18-25 and 3.3°C, and for group III strains 40 and 15°C, respectively2. The cells of all strains of C. botulinum are straight to slightly curved sporulating, anaerobic bacilli with round ends, measuring 2 to 20 µM in length and 0.5 to 2 µM in width31. The spores are oval and sub-terminal and usually swell to occupy the sporangium92. The spores are resistant to heat, desiccation, chemicals, radiation and oxygen which facilitate their survival for very long periods. Most cultures retain Gram stain well, becoming Gram-negative only after sporulation or during late stationary phase31.

It is thought that since C. botulinum is an anaerobic organism, it will be unable to grow in foods which are exposed to oxygen or in foods which do not have a low oxidation-reduction potential (Eh). Actually, the Eh of the food exposed to oxygen is low enough in most of the food to permit the growth of C. botulinum. Even though the maximum growth occurs at an Eh of -350 mV93, C. botulinum can grow at Eh values as high as + 250 mV94. A substantial body of research has shown no growth of C. botulinum at pH 4.8 or lower and led to the current government regulation that canned foods at pH 4.6 or lower would be safe without conventional sterilization95. One of the first definitive attempts to influence water activity (aw) was performed by Denny et al96 and reported that the growth of C. botulinum type A and B was dependent on aw of canned bread and not on moisture content. No toxin was produced in canned breads stored up to two years with aw values ≤ 0.950. Emodi & Lechowich97 found that the minimum aw for the growth of type E ranges from 0.972 to 0.978 in a wide variety of solutes. The minimum aw values for the growth of types A and B in food is 0.94 and for type E is 0.97 corresponding to a sodium chloride concentration of 10 and 5 per cent, respectively.

Identity of C. botulinum and other BoNT producing clostridia is confirmed by toxin detection. Table Ilists detection limits, field applicability and the types of samples for which BoNT assays were demonstrated.

Table I

Performance of existing botulinum toxin assays

AssayType of toxinTime of the assayDetection limitPotential for field Diagnostics*Sample type
Mouse neutralization assay88A, B, C, D, E, F, G1-4 days20-30 pg/ml++Foods, serum and stool
TRF98A, B2 h20-200 pg/ml.+Clinical/environmental samples
Fluorometric Biosensor99A, Buncertain?+/-Aassay buffer and live cells
Modified ELISA100A, B, E, F6 h0.6 ng/ml++Liquid and solid foods, serum
Micromechanosensor101B15 min>8 nM++Sample buffer
Mass Spectometry MALDI-TOF-MS/Endopeptidase-MS102A, B, E, F4 - 16 h5 pg/ml or lower+/-Milk, serum and stool extract
BoNT ALISSA103A2-3 h0.5 fg/ml++Serum, milk, carrot juice, gelatin and phosphate diluents
Immuno-PCR104A, B, E4 - 6 h50 fg/ml+/-Carbonate buffer
Liposome PCR assay105A6 h0.2 fg/ml+/-Carbonate buffer
Enzyme-amplified protein microarray immunoassay106A10 min1.4pg/ml+Blood and plasma
SPR170B, F5 min0.1 pg/ml+/-Assay buffer
Ganglioside-liposome immunoassay108A20 min15pg/ml+/-Assay buffer
*Potential for field diagnostics: ++ high, +intermediate, +/- low

In outbreaks of botulism, it is customary to assay suspected foods, patient’s sera, faeces samples and enrichment cultures for the presence of toxin91. Half ml of undiluted toxin preparation with same amount of 1:2, 1:10 and 1:100 diluted antisera in gelatin phosphate buffer should be intra-peritoneally injected in pairs of 15-20 g mice. Through incorporation of serotype testing by Leuchs46 and Burke47, the method has evolved present day form, the mouse bioassay88. The second stage of the mouse lethality test is to identify the serological toxin type by mouse protection assay with specific monovalent (types A-G) antisera. Universally acknowledged for detecting biological activity of BoNTs in samples, the mouse bioassay, although is highly sensitive, has been criticized as being slow, laborious, expensive and lacking in specificity. Furthermore, the increasing public resistance to animal testing makes it clear that there is a need to replace bioassay with reliable in vitro test109. Recovery of C. botulinum from stools or gastric samples with symptoms and signs indicative of botulism is usually sufficient for confirmation. Recovery of the organism from food that does not contain demonstrable toxin is inconclusive. Electrophysiological studies can provide a presumptive diagnosis of botulism in patients with clinical signs of botulism110 and can be especially helpful when laboratory tests are negative.

Numerous attempts were made to replace mouse bioassay with immunological based methods i.e., fluorescent antibody test111, immunodiffusion112, fiber optic biosensor113, streptavidin-biotin amplified ELISA114 and ELCA (enzyme linked coagulation assay) amplified ELISA115. Some of these methods are sensitive enough and used in some laboratories for screening samples, however, any of these methods is so far not authorized for official or clinical use due to their inability to differentiate active and inactive neurotoxin109. Recently, PCR-ELISA has been used for the study of prevalence of C. botulinum type A, B, E and F in fish and environmental samples in northern France116. In another attempt, extreme biological specificity of the BoNTs for proteins VAMP, SNAP25, etc., in the nerve cells, has been utilized in a novel ‘second generation’ ELISA, the endopeptidase assay117. Attempts are also being made to develop sensitive endopeptidase assay utilizing small fluorigenic peptide substrates for the protease activities of botulinum neurotoxins, serotypes A, B, and F118.

PCR-based methods119 detecting the botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) gene was pioneered to replace the time consuming conventional methods and mouse bioassay. Since then different workers42,120125 have applied this technique for the detection of BoNT genes in epidemics, environmental samples screening and epidemiological prevalence studies. Lindstrom et al126 have described and detected four BoNT genes namely types A, B, E and F by multiplex PCR.

The first report about genomic characterization of C. botulinum was published in 1995 and included MRP analysis of four type A strains by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)127. Hielm et al128 described the use of PFGE in genomic analysis of group II C botulinum and found it to be highly discriminating and reproducible. However, not all strains were typeable either due to DNA degradation by active endonucleases or resistance of the cell wall to lysis. The application of rRNA gene restriction pattern analysis (ribotyping) for the genomic characterization of C. botulinum groups I and II strains has also been reported129. However, the discriminatory power was found to be lower than that of PFGE and there were some difficulties in the interpretation of patterns generated by certain restriction enzymes. Therefore, ribotyping was concluded to be suitable only for taxonomic purposes in C. botulinum species identification.

Protection against botulinum neurotoxin

Since the reported cases of all forms of botulism are rare, vaccination for general population is not warranted on the basis of cost and expected adverse reactions with even the best vaccines. Moreover, vaccination against BoNT will restrict its therapeutic and cosmetic applications in the subjects. There are two basic alternatives for prophylaxis of high risk individuals from botulinum poisoning; active immunization using a vaccine, or passive immunotherapy using immunoglobulin. In cases of wound botulism, the wound should be surgically debrided and antibiotics should be administered (usually penicillin). A pentavalent crude toxoid vaccine (A-E) and a singular F toxoid are investigational drugs distributed by the CDC to military and research workers that might come into contact with toxin130. Since these have not acquired FDA approval, these toxoid vaccines are not licensed for general distribution. The impetus to meet FDA requirements is low, because these vaccines require frequent boosters and are toxic due to the formaldehyde used to inactivate the toxins131. Efficacy of the pentavalent botulinum toxoid (PBT) was evaluated and antibodies concentrations were found to be significantly higher (≥ 0.25 U) in 99 per cent of the 508 military personnel vaccinated before and after Persian Gulf War132.

Even though toxoid vaccines are available, there are numerous shortcomings with their current use133. (i) C. botulinum being spore former, a dedicated facility is required; (ii) yields of toxin production are very low; (iii) the toxoiding process involves large quantities of toxin and thus dangerous; (iv) toxoid proteins are not purified thus other proteins may influence immunogenicity or reactivity of the vaccine; and (v) since the residual levels of formalin are part of the product formulation to prevent reactivation of toxin, the vaccine is reactogenic. The development of a new generation recombinant vaccine could alleviate many of the problems associated with the toxoid. So the alternative approaches to develop vaccines against the botulinum neurotoxins are currently being pursued by several laboratories. Attassi & Oshima134 have synthesized a series of overlapping 19 mer peptides that spawned the entire Hc region of BoNT/A and reported as vaccine candidate. Lee et al135 introduced a gene fragment encoding non-toxic Hc region of BoNT/A into Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus replicon vector to yield high levels of Hc that protected mice against a 105 LD50 challenge of BoNT/A. Byrne et al136 expressed the region of BoNT/A in Pichia pastoris and recombinant BoNT/A Hc prevented botulinum intoxication. Immunization of mice with three doses of 1 mg heavy chain of BoNT/B was fully protective when mice were challenged with 106 LD50 BoNT/B after 1 year of vaccination133. DNA vaccine137 fused with signal peptide could protect mice against 104 MLD challenge of BoNT/F. Recently, a single dose of adenovirus-vectored vaccine molecules derived from heavy chain of type C are reported to provide protection against botulism138,139.

Antitoxin therapy140 is more effective if undertaken early in the course of illness. The only antitoxins available are equine antitoxin from CDC (neutralizing antibodies against BoNT/A, /B, and /E) and an investigational heptavalent (against ABCDEFG) antitoxin. BabyBIG®, derived from the blood of human donors vaccinated with a pentavalent (ABCDE) toxoid vaccine, is only available for infant botulism141. This is not surprising when one considers that equine antitoxin neutralizes only toxin molecules yet unbound to nerve endings142. More than 80 per cent of persons reported with adult botulism in the United States are treated with antitoxin. However, treatment is not without risk, as approximately 9 per cent of persons treated experience hypersensitivity reactions143. A human-derived botulism antitoxin, termed “botulism immune globulin”144, has been prepared, and a clinical trial of its efficacy when given early in the course of illness is in progress in California.

Molecular inhibitors against neurotoxin

The BoNT molecule is divided in clear functional domains that can operate independently. This feature provides multiple targets for designing therapeutics to treat botulism. Therapeutics against BoNT can target any of the three steps of mode of action of BoNT: binding, endocytosis/translocation, and endopeptidase activity. Humanized monoclonal antibodies, small peptides, peptide mimetics, receptor mimics, and small molecules targeting active sites are candidates for inhibiting botulinum toxin and may eventually be used in treatment strategies. Studies reported that toosendanin145147 (major limonoid constituent of the bark of the tree M. toosendan) could protect monkeys from BoNT/A, BoNT/B, and BoNT/E-induced death in a dose dependent fashion when co-administered with, or several hours after, neurotoxin administration. A semisynthetic strategy to identify inhibitors based on toosendanin, has been reported by Fischer et al148 to protect from BoNT intoxication.

Based on the substrate information, several small peptides have been developed as competitive inhibitors for the BoNT endopeptidase activity. Peptidomimetics and hydroxamic acid-based inhibitors have been developed that display inhibitory effects149152 in the high nm range for the light chain of the BoNT serotype A.

Many drug-like small molecule libraries are available commercially as well as in national repositories. Screening these drug-like compounds has become critical in finding new therapeutic candidates. Screening such libraries requires a robust assay feasible for the high throughput screening. Such assays have been developed for screening the endopeptidase activity of BoNT106,107, making it feasible to find inhibitors against the protease activity of BoNT by screening large library of compounds.

Other target to design antagonists against botulism is to block the binding between BoNTs and their receptors. Cai et al153 have demonstrated that the quinic acid can inhibit the binding between HcQ and the ganglioside at the concentration of 10 mM. While receptor mimics are valid targets for designing inhibitors against the botulism, like antibody based therapy, the treatment window for such agents is short, since they can only target at the circulation level. Once the toxin gets internalized into the nerve cells, effectiveness of receptor-based inhibitors will be very limited.

Aptamers form unique structures that provide basis for high affinity and specificity towards their targets (proteins or the small molecules). Their specific and tight interactions serve as valuable tools to modulate or block functions of proteins. The screening process for aptamers is popularly termed as SELEX (Systematic Evolution of Ligands through EXponential enrichment). An efficient and easy-to-execute single microbead SELEX approach is developed to generate high affinity ssDNA aptamers against botulinum neurotoxin154.

Targeting extracellular neutralization and binding of BoNT to cell surface will provide effective prophylactic treatment and prevention measures to botulism. An effective BoNT-based drug delivery vehicle can be used to directly deliver toxin inhibitors into intoxicated nerve terminal cytosol to reverse the paralysis. Recently, amino dextran based drug delivery vehicle has been reported to deliver BoNT-A antidotes into BoNT-A intoxicated cultured mouse spinal cord cells155. This approach can potentially be utilized for targeted drug delivery to treat other neuronal and neuromuscular disorders.

BoNTs as magic drug

One of the most fascinating aspects on C. botulinum in recent years has been development of the most potent toxin into a molecule of significant therapeutic utility. Purified protein derived from the bacterium C. botulinum type A was originally developed about three decades ago by US scientists for medical use156,157. BoNT is the first bacterial toxin licensed by USFDA as ‘occulinum’ a drug for the treatment of blepharospasm in 1989. Botox® (from Allergan), minute amount of purified BoNT/A, is the only botulinum toxin treatment to have undergone the rigorous approval process in 15 countries required to secure a license for the treatment of facial wrinkles. This holds a unique position in that it is a safe and effective medical treatment for a number of highly distressing conditions, while also being used as a cosmetic therapy where there is no underlying medical condition. Lately, BoNT/B158 and BoNT/F159 were also successfully used to prevent muscles hyperactivity. As of January 2008, two BoNT serotypes (A and B) are approved for clinical use in the United States by Food and Drug Administration (www.fda.gov). A carefully purified and defined quantity of the botulinum neurotoxin is injected by a trained surgeon within the spastic muscle which considerably reduce presynaptic outflow of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction, with a consequent diminution in muscle hyperactivity/contraction, while leaving some strength for the physiological function. A basal rate of acetylcholine secretion across the synaptic cleft occurs continuously, with each packet of acetylcholine depolarizing the post-synaptic membrane to create miniature end plate potentials (MEPPs). MEPPs summate to maintain the motor end-plate potential (EPP). Botulinum neurotoxins prevent acetylcholine secretion, reducing the frequency and quantity, but not amplitude of MEPPs. The motor EPP is reduced below the muscle membrane threshold and the ability to generate muscle fiber action potentials and subsequent contraction is diminished160. These toxins are safe drugs. One reason is that upon injection the protein does not diffuse beyond 2 cm, exerting its paralyzing activity around the injection site with very limited spreading. Several pharmaceutical preparations of botulinum toxins for the treatment of human diseases in ophthalmology, neurology and dermatology are currently marketed under the trade names Botox®, Dysport® and Xeomin® (based on botulinum neurotoxin A), and Myoblock® /Neuroblock® (based on botulinum neurotoxin B)161163. With the exception of Xeomin, which is practically devoid of complexing proteins164, the other commercial formulations of botulinum toxins include, besides the neurotoxin, other bacterial complexing haemagglutinins and nonhaemagglutinin proteins as well. Several additional substances (e.g., albumin, sucrose, lactose) are included in these preparations and aim at drug stabilization and facilitation of administration by intramuscular injection. In lyophilized form the toxins may be kept in long storage; however, if diluted with saline for injection, these must be used within a few hours. The biological potency of these preparations is expressed in mouse units. One mouse unit is defined as the intraperitoneally injected quantity of each pharmaceutical product required to kill 50 per cent (LD50) of an experimental group of female Swiss-Webster mice, each of 20 g body weight. The US FDA has approved use of these preparations in cervical dystonia, blepharospasm, spasmodic, torticollis, strabismus and glabellar frown lines. These are being used in approximately 150 different indications, e.g., disorders of ocular motility, writer’s cramp, hemi facial spasm and spasticity, achalasia, chronic anal fissure and hyperhidrosis (Table II). The new uses for this ‘wonder drug’ are under constant evaluation, including gastrointestinal smooth muscles and skeletal muscle spasm following CNS injury, cosmetic management of wrinkles179 and debarking of dogs178. One vial of Botox contains 100 units (U) of purified neurotoxin complex produced by C. botulinum type A, 0.5 mg of albumin (human), and 0.9 mg of sodium chloride in a sterile, vacuum-dried form without a preservative. The lethal dose of the Botox preparation for a person of 70 kg is calculated to be 2,500-3,000 units. The recommended dose for large muscles, localized by touch, (e.g. gastrocnemius) is 100-400 units, whereas for cosmetic purposes usually less than 30 units are injected directly into the targeted muscle. For smaller muscles or deeper muscles, detected through electrostimulation, (e.g. orbicularis oculi) 1-2 sites of injection and a quantity of 3–4 units are effective, whereas a large muscle (e.g. gastrocnemius) requires 4-5 injections and 300-400 units180,181.

Table II

Uses of botulinum neurotoxin

IndicationExample
Dystonias165Cervical dystonia, Oromandibular dystonia, Pharyngolaryngial dystonias, Jaw closure/opening dystonias, Occupational cramps, Limb and axial dystonias
Spasticity166Cerebral palsy, Brain injury, Spinal cord injury
Eyelid spasm167Blepharospasm, Hemifacial spasm, Eyelid twitch
Exocrine gland hyperactivity168Focal hyperhidrosis, Relative sialorrohoea, Crocodile tears syndrome,
Movement disorders169Tremors, Bruxism, Tic
Pain syndromes170Migraine, Back spasm
Urinary bladder dysfunction171Sphincter- detrusor dyssenergia, detrusor hyperreflexia,
Opthalmology172Strabismus, Entropion, Protective ptosis
Cosmetology173Hyperactive facial lines-brow lines, Frown lines,
Gastroenterology174Achalasia, Anal fissures, Anismus
Gynecology175Vaginismus
Urology176Sterile prostatitis
Dentistry177Muscle spasm associated with temporomandibular joint pathology
Veterinary178Barking dogs

Inherent in the use of a protein-based therapeutic is the potential for antibody formation leading to a decrease in effectiveness of the treatment. Such secondary non-responders are seen in a relatively low percentage of patients, most commonly requiring large doses of BoNT, often on repeated occasions. Since the majority of the immune response is generated toward the Hc fragment, future protein engineering of hybrid toxins could provide one route to prolong the therapeutic efficacy of BoNT treatment.

Future directions

Although some progress has been made in recent years, identification and characterization of the protein receptors for the BoNTs and determination of the mechanism of specificity of CNT binding domains for their receptors is an outstanding problem. Further, understanding the mechanism of LC translocation and activation within the motorneuron, including the effects of pH on the tertiary structures of BoNTs, will be crucial for rational design of engineered BoNT therapeutics. Further structural studies on the endopeptidase domains of BoNTs, including the structural basis behind BoNT substrate specificity, might lead to the development of serotype-specific inhibitors.

It has been proposed that the extreme neurospecificity of BoNT heavy chains could be applied to deliver engineered molecule in to nerve cells. This can be achieved by the replacement of light chain with desired therapeutic agent that could be reached in the nerve endings without iatrogenic complications which might otherwise occur182. Use of fragments of BoNT for the therapeutics of the future is also exciting. For example, harnessing the properties of the BoNT LC endopeptidase fragments for the creation of a range of ‘designer’ therapeutics is a real possibility following the successful retargeting of the LC/A domain to cells of neuronal and non-neuronal origin183. Additionally, the ability of BoNTs to transport large polypeptides across the membranes could be harnessed for the delivery of biopharmaceuticals to cytosolic targets184. Derivatives of BoNT/A and BoNT/B can target compounds specifically to human neuroblastoma cells. The therapeutic potential of clostridial toxins is not limited to the neurotoxin for the inhibition of neurotransmitter release, but also has potential as an anticancer drug62. The technology termed ‘clostridia directed enzyme pro-drug therapy’ (CDEPT) in which intravenously injected clostridial spores are used to target hypoxic regions of solid tumours. Spores get localized to solid tumours exclusively for germination, as they cannot grow in healthy tissues. Genetic modification of the clostridial host to express anti cancer compounds or pro-drug converting enzymes (as in CEDPT), has the potential to lead the localized destruction of solid tumour tissue.

Botulinum neurotoxins are of great interest to the medical and scientific communities. Despite causing disease, they have become valuable research tools and have wide-ranging applications as pharmaceuticals. As the structure and mechanism of action of the toxins are further dissected, the development of vaccines, serotype-specific inhibitors and novel therapeutics will undoubtedly follow.

References

1. Bigalke H, Shoer LF. In: Clostridial neurotoxins: Handbook of experimental pharmacology. Aktories K, Just I, editors. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2001. pp. 407–47. [Google Scholar]
2. Hatheway CL. Clostridium botulinum and other Clostridia that produce botulinum neurotoxins. In: Hauschild AHW, Dodds KL, editors. Clostridium botulinum: Ecology and control in foods. New York: Marcel Dekkar; 1992. pp. 3–20. [Google Scholar]
3. Lamanna C. The most poisonous poison. Science. 1959;130:763–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Dolman CE. Botulism as a world health problem. In: Lewis KH, Kassel K Jr, editors. Botulism. Cincinnati: Ohio: U.S: Public Health Service; 1964. pp. 5–32. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. [Google Scholar]
5. Van Ermengem E. About a new anaerobic bacillus and its relationship to botulism. Z Hyg Infektionskr. 1897;26:1–56. [Google Scholar]
6. Bengston IA. Studies on organisms concerned as causative factors in botulism. Hyg Lab Bull. 1924;136:101. [Google Scholar]
7. Midura TF. Update: infant botulism. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1996;9:119–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Hughes JM, Blumenthal JR, Merson MH, Lombard GL, Dowell VR, Jr, Gangarosa EJ. Clinical features of type A and B food-borne botulism. Ann Intern Med. 1981;95:442–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Hatheway CL. Botulism: the present status of the disease. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1995;195:55–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Hatheway CL. Botulism. In: Balows A, Hausler WH, Ohashi M, Turnano A, editors. Laboratory diagnosis of infectious diseases: principles and practice. vol. 1. Berlin Heidelberg Springer: New York; 1988. pp. 111–33. [Google Scholar]
11. Hauschild AHW. Epidemiology of human foodborne botulism. In: Hauschild AHW, Dodds KL, editors. Clostridium botulinum Ecology and Control in foods. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1992. pp. 68–104. [Google Scholar]
12. Angulo FJ, Getz J, Taylor JP, Hendricks KA, Hatheway CL, Barth SS, et al. A large outbreak of botulism: the hazardous baked potato. J Infect Dis. 1998;178:172–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Botulism associated with canned chili sauce. Atlanta: CDC; 2007. Centers for Diseases Control (CDC) July-Aug. [Google Scholar]
14. Chou JH, Hwant PH, Malison MD. An outbreak of type A foodborne botulism in Taiwan due to commercially preserved peanuts. Int J Epidemiol. 1988;17:899–902. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Kalluri P, Crowe C, Reller M, Gaul L, Hayslett J, Barth S, et al. An outbreak of foodborne botulism associated with food sold at a salvage store in Texas. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37:1490–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. O’Mahony M, Mitchell E, Gilbert RJ, Hutchinson DN, Begg NT, Rodhouse JC, et al. An outbreak of foodborne botulism associated with contaminated hazelnut yoghurt. Epidemiol Infect. 1990;104:389–95. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. St Louis ME, Peck SH, Bowering GB, Bltherwick J, Banerjee S, Kettyls GD, et al. Botulism from chopped garlic: delayed recognition of a major outbreak. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:363–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Steth AN, Wiersma P, Atrubin D, Dubey V, Zink D, Skinner G, et al. International outbreak of severe botulism with prolonged toxemia caused by commercial carrot juice. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:1245–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Villar RG, Shapiro RL, Busto S, Riva-Posse C, Verdejo G, Farace MI, et al. Outbreak of type A botulism and development of a botulism surveillance and antitoxin release system in Argentina. JAMA. 1999;281:1334–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Midura TF, Arnon SS. Infant botulism: Identification of Clostridium botulinum and its toxin in feces. Lancet. 1976;2:934–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Shapiro RL, Hatheway CL, Swerdlow DL. Botulism in the United States:A clinical and epidemiological review. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:221–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Arnon SS. Human tetanus and human botulism. In: Rood JI, McClane BA, Songer JG, Titball RW, editors. The Clostridia: Molecular biology and pathogenesis. London: Academic press; 1997. pp. 95–115. [Google Scholar]
23. Arnon SS, Midura TF, Damus K. Honey and other environmental risk factors for infant botulism. J Pediatr. 1979;194:331–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Nevas M, Lindstrom M, Virtanen A, Hielm S, Kuusi M, Arnon SS, et al. Infant botulism acquired from household dust presenting as sudden infant death syndrome. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:511–3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Koepke R, Sobel J, Arnon SS. Global occurrence of infant botulism, 1976-2006. Paediatrics. 2008;122:73–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Passaro DJ, Werner SB, McGee J, MacKenzie WR, Vugia DJ. Wound botulism associated with black tar heroin among injecting drug user. JAMA. 1998;279:859–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Brett MM, Hood J, Brazier JS, Duerden BI, Hahne SJ. Soft tissue infections caused by spore-forming bacteria in injecting drug users in the United Kingdom. Epidemiol Infect. 2005;133:575–82. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Preuss SF, Veelken F, Galldiks N, Klussmann JP, Neugebauer P, Nolden-Hoverath S, et al. A rare differential diagnosis in dysphagia: wound botulism. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:831–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. Artin I, Bjorkman P, Cronqvist J, Radstrom P, Holst E. First case of type E wound botulism diagnosed using real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:3589–94. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Critchley JMR. A comparison of human and animal botulism: A review. J R Soc Med. 1991;84:295–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Smith LDS, Sugiyama H. Botulism: The organism, its toxins, the disease. 2nd ed. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C Thomas; 1988. p. 171. [Google Scholar]
32. Dutra IS, Seifert HSH. Water holes- incubation areas for botulism in Brazil? In: Bohnel H, editor. Proceeding of the 1st International conferrence on identification and immunbiology of Clostridia: Diagnosis and prevention of clostridioses. Teistungen: Germany; 1998. [Google Scholar]
33. Eklund MW. Control in fishery products. In: Hauschild AHW, Dodds KL, editors. Clostridium botulinum. Ecology and control in foods. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1992. pp. 209–32. [Google Scholar]
34. Myllykoski J, Lindstrom M, Keto-Timonen R, Soderholm H, Jakala J, Kallio H, et al. Type C bovine botulism outbreak due to carcass contaminated non-acidified silage. Epidemiol Infect. 2008;7:1–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Holzer E. Botulism caused by inhalation. Med Klin. 1962;41:1735–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Franz DR, Pitt LM, Clayton MA, Hanes MA, Rose KJ. Efficacy of prophylactic and therapeutic administration of antitoxin for inhalation botulism. In: DasGupta BR, editor. Botulinum and tetanus Neurotoxins and Biomedical aspects. New York: Plenum Press; 1993. pp. 473–6. [Google Scholar]
37. Park JB, Simpson LL. Inhalational poisoning by botulinum toxin and inhalational vaccination with its heavy chain component. Infect Immun. 2003;71:1147–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. Sobel J. Botulism. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;4:1167–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39. Chertow DS, Tan ET, Maslanka SE, Schulte J, Bresnitz EA, Weisman RS, et al. Botulism in 4 adults following cosmetic injections with an unlicensed highly concentrated botulinum preparation. JAMA. 2006;296:2476–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40. Chaudhry R, Dhawan B, Kumar D, Bhatia R, Gandhi JC, Patel RK, et al. Outbreak of suspected Clostridium butyricum botulism in India. Emerg Infect Dis. 1998;4:506–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41. Agarwal AK, Goel A, Kohli A, Rohtagi A, Kumar R. Food-borne botulism. J Assoc Physicians India. 2004;52:677–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42. Dhaked RK, Sharma SK, Parida MM, Singh L. Isolation and characterization of Clostridium botulinum Type ‘E’ from soil of Gwalior, India. J Nat Toxins. 2002;11:49–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43. Lalitha KV, Gopakumar K. Distribution and ecology of Clostridium botulinum in fish and aquatic environments of a tropical region. Food Microbiol. 2000;17:535–41. [Google Scholar]
44. Lalitha KV, Surendran PK. Occurrence of Clostridium botulinum in fresh and cured fish in retail trade in Cochin (India) Int J Food Microbiol. 2002;72:169–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45. Joshy L, Chaudhry R, Chandel DS. Multiplex PCR for the detection of Clostridium. botulinum & C. perfringens toxin genes. Indian J Med Res. 2008;128:206–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46. Leuchs J. Contributions to the knowledge of the toxin and antitoxin of Bacilius botulinus. Ztschr Hyg Infektskh. 1910;65:55–84. [Google Scholar]
47. Burke GS. Notes on Bacillus botulinus. J Bacteriol. 1919;4:555–65. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48. Seddon HR. Bulbar paralysis in cattle due to the action of toxicogenic bacillus, with a discussion on the relationship of the condition to forage poisoning (botulism) J Comp Pathol Therap. 1922;35:147–90. [Google Scholar]
49. Thieler A, Viljoen PR, Green HH, du Toit PJ, Meier H, Robinson EM. 11th and 12th Report of Director Veterinary Education and Research Part II, Sect. 5 Department of Agriculture. Union South Africa; 1927. Lamsiekte (parabotulism) in cattle in South Africa; pp. 1201–11. [Google Scholar]
50. Gunnison JB, Cummings JR, Meyer KF. Clostridium botulinum type E. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1953;35:278–80. [Google Scholar]
51. Moller V, Scheibel I. Preliminary report on the isolation of an apparently new type of Clostridium botulinum. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1960;48:80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52. Gimenez DF, Ciccarelli AS. Another type of Clostridium botulinum. Zentralbl Bakteriol Prasiten kd Infektionskr Hyg Abt 1 Orig. 1970;A215:221–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53. Lee WH, Reimann H. The genetic relatedness of proteolytic Clostridium botulinum strains. J Gen Microbiol. 1970;64:85–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54. Holdeman LV, Brooks JB. Variations among strains of Clostridium botulinum and related clostridia. In: Herzberg M, editor. Proceedings of the First US-Japan conference on toxigenic microorganisms. Washingtan: US Government Printing Office; 1970. pp. 278–86. [Google Scholar]
55. Hutson RA, Thompson DE, Lawson PA, Schocken-Itturino RP, Bottger EC, Collins MD. Genetic interrelationships of proteolytic Clostridium botulinum types A, B, and F and other members of Clostridium botulinum complex as revealed by small-subunit rRNA gene sequences. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 1993;64:273–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56. Hutson RA, Thompson DE, Collins MD. Genetic interrelationships of saccharolytic Clostridium botulinum types B, E and F and related clostridia as revealed by small-subunit rRNA gene sequences. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1993;108:103–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57. Collins MD, Lawson PA, Willems A, Cordoba JJ, Fernandez-Garayzabal J, Garcia P, et al. The phylogeny of the genus Clostridium: proposal of five new genera and eleven new species combinations. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1994;44:812–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58. Smith LDS, Hobbs G. Genus III. Clostridium prazmowski 1980, 23. In: Buchanen RE, Gibson NE, editors. Bergey’s mannual of determinative bacteriology. 8th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1974. pp. 551–72. [Google Scholar]
59. Suen JG, Hatheway CL, Steigerwalt AG, Brenner DJ. Clostridium botulinum sp. nov: A genetically homogenous group composed of all strains of Clostridium botulinum toxin type G and some non-toxigenic strains previously identified as Clostridium subterminale or Clostridium hastiforme. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1988;38:375–81. [Google Scholar]
60. Aureli P, Fenicia L, Pasolini B, Gianfranceschi M, McCroskey LM, Hatheway CL. Two cases of type E infant botulism in Rome caused by neurotoxigenic Clostridium butyricum. J Infect Dis. 1986;154:207–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61. Hall JD, McCroskey LM, Pinkomb BJ, Hatheway CL. Isolation of an organism resembling Clostridium beratii which produce type F botulinal toxin from an infant with botulism. J Clin Microbiol. 1985;21:654–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62. Minton NP. Molecular genetics clostridial neurotoxins. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1995;95:161–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63. Brinkac LM, Daugherty S, Dodson RJ, Madupu R, Brown JL, Bruce D, et al. Complete sequence of Clostridium botulinum strain Langeland/NCTC10281/Type F Submitted to the EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ databases. 2007 JUN. [Google Scholar]
64. Brinkac LM, Brown JL, Bruce D, Detter C, Munk C, Smith LA, et al. Complete sequence of Clostridium botulinum strain type B Eklund. Submitted to the EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ databases. 2008 APR. [Google Scholar]
65. Sebaihia M, Peck MW, Minton NP, Thomson NR, Holden MTG, Mitchell WJ, et al. Genome sequence of a proteolytic (Group I) Clostridium botulinum strain Hall A and comparative analysis of the clostridial genomes. Genome Res. 2007;17:1082–92. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66. Smith TJ, Hill KK, Foley BT, Detter JC, Munk AC, Bruce DC, et al. Analysis of the neurotoxin complex genes in Clostridium botulinum A1-A4 and B1 strains: BoNT/A3, /Ba4 and /B1 clusters are located within plasmids. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:E1271–E1271. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67. Shrivastava S, Brinkac LM, Brown JL, Bruce D, Detter CC, Johnson EA, et al. Genome sequence of Clostridium botulinum A2 Kyoto. Submitted to the EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ databases. 2008 OCT. [Google Scholar]
68. Shrivastava S, Brown JL, Bruce D, Detter C, Munk C, Smith LA, et al. Genome sequence of Clostridium botulinum Ba4 strain 657. Submitted to the EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ databases. 2008 MAY. [Google Scholar]
69. Peck MW. Clostridium botulinum and the safety of minimally heated, chilled foods: an emerging issue? J Appl Micrbiol. 2006;101:556–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
70. Schiavo G, Rossetto O, Tonello F, Montecucco C. Intracellular target and metalloprotease activity of tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1995;195:257–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
71. Villar RG, Elliot SP, Davenport KM. Botulism: the many faces of botulinum toxin and its potential for bioterrorism. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2006;20:313–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
72. Sugii S, Sakaguchi G. Molecular construction of Clostridium botulinum type A toxins. Infect Immun. 1975;12:1262–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
73. Inoue K, Fuginaga Y, Watanabe T, Oshyama T, Takeshi K, Moriishi K, et al. Molecular composition of Clostridium botulinum type A progenitor toxins. Infect Immun. 1996;64:1589–94. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
74. Chen F, Kuziemco GM, Stevens R. Biophysical characterization of the stability of the 150-Kilodalton botulinum toxin, the non-toxic component and the 900-Kilodalton botulinum toxin complex species. Infect Immun. 1998;66:2420–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
75. Sakaguchi G, Kozaki S, Ohnishi I. Structure and function of botulinum toxins. In: Alouf JE, Fehrenbach FJ, Freer JH, Jeljaszewics J, editors. Bacterial protein toxins. London: Academic Press; 1984. pp. 435–43. [Google Scholar]
76. Montecucco C, Schiavo G. Mechanism of action of tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins. Mol Microbiol. 1994;13:1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
77. Schiavo G, Malizio C, Trimble WS, Polverino de Laureto P, Milan G, et al. Botulinum G neurotoxin cleaves VAMP/synaptobrevin at a single Ala-Ala peptide bond. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:20213–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
78. Binz T, Blasi J, Yamasaki S, Baumeister A, Link E, Sudhof TC, et al. Proteolysis of SNAP-25 by type E and A botulinum nerotoxins. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:1717–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
79. Schiavo G, Rossetto O, Catsicas S, Polverino de Laureto P, DasGupta BR, et al. Identification of the nerve terminal targets of botulinum neurotoxin serotypes A, D, and E. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:23784–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
80. Schiavo G, Santucci A, DasGupta BR, Mehta PP, Jontes J, Benfenati F, et al. Botulinum neurotoxin serotypes A and E cleave SNAP-25 at distinct COOH-terminal peptide bonds. FEBS Lett. 1993;335:99–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
81. Osen–Sand A, Staple JK, Naldi E, Schiavo G, Rossetto O, Petitpierre S, et al. Common and distinct fusion proteins in axonal growth and transmitter release. J Comp Neurol. 1996;367:222–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
82. Schiavo G, Benfenati F, Poulain B, Rossetto O, Polverino de Laureto P, DasGupta BR, et al. Tetanus and botulism B neurotoxins block neurotransmitter release by proteolytic cleavage of synaptobrevin. Nature. 1992;359:832–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
83. Schiavo G, Shone CC, Rossetto O, Alexander FC, Montecucco C. Botulinum neurotoxin serotype F is a zinc endopeptidase specific for VAMP/synaptobrevin. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:11516–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
84. Yamazaki S, Baumeister A, Binz T, Blasi J, Link E, Cornille F, et al. Cleavage of members of synaptobrevin/VAMP family by types D and F botulinal neurotoxins and tetanus toxin. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:12764–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
85. Blasi J, Chapman ER, Yamasaki S, Binz T, Niemann H, Jahn R. Botulinum neurotoxin C1 block the release by means of cleavage HPC-1/syntaxin. EMBO J. 1993;12:4821–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
86. Schiavo G, Shone CC, Bennett MK, Scheller RH, Montecucco C. Botulinum neurotoxin type C cleaves a single Lys-Ala bond within the carboxyl-terminal region of syntaxins. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:10566–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
87. Lilly T, Harmon SM, Kautter DA, Solomon HM, Lynt RK. An improved medium for detection of Clostridium botulinum type E. J Milk Food Technol. 1971;34:492–7. [Google Scholar]
88. Kautter DA, Solomon HM, Lake DE, Bernard DT, Mills DC. Clostridium botulinum and its toxin. In: Vanderzant C, Splittstoesser DF, editors. Compendium of methods for microbiological examination of foods. 3rd ed. Washington: American Public Health Association; 1992. pp. 605–21. [Google Scholar]
89. Dezfulian M, McCroskey LM, Hatheway CL, Dowell VR., Jr Selective medium for isolation of Clostridium botulinum from human feces. J Clin Microbiol. 1981;13:526–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
90. Hobbs G. Clostridium botulinum and its importance in fishery products. In: Chechester CO, Mrak EM, Stewart GF, editors. Advances in food research. New York: Academic Press Inc; 1976. pp. 135–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
91. Varnam AH, Evans MG. Foodborne pathogens- an illustrated text. London: Wolfe Publishing; 1991. Clostridium botulinum; pp. 289–311. [Google Scholar]
92. Cato EP, George WL, Finegold SM. Genus Clostridium. In: Sneath PHA, Mair NS, Sharpe ME, Hold JG, editors. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. vol. 2. Baltimore, MA: Williams and Wilkins; 1986. pp. 1141–200. [Google Scholar]
93. Smoot LA, Pierson MD. Effect of oxidation-reduction potential on the outgrowth and chemical inhibition of Clostridium botulinum 10755A spores. J Food Sci. 1979;44:700–4. [Google Scholar]
94. Huss HH, Schaeffer I, Pedersen A, Jepsen A. Toxin production by Clostridium botulinum type E in smoked fish in relation to the measured oxidation reduction potential (Eh), packaging method, and associated microflora. Adv Fish Sci Technol. 1980;13:476–9. [Google Scholar]
95. Code for Federal Regulations (CFR). Thermally processed low-acid foods packaged in hermetically sealed containers: definitions. Title 21. Section 113.3. US Govt. Print Office Washington, DC. 1981 [Google Scholar]
96. Denny JB, Goeke DJ., Jr . National Canners Association. Washington DC: 1969. Inoculation of Clostridium botulinum in canned bread with special reference to water activity; pp. 4–69. Res Rep No. [Google Scholar]
97. Emodi AS, Lechowich RV. Low temperature growth of type E Clostridium botulinum spores. 2. Effects of solutes and incubation temperature. J Food Sci. 1969;34:82–93. [Google Scholar]
98. Peruski AH, Johnson LH, Peruski LF. Rapid and sensitive detection of biological warfare agents using time-resolved fluorescence assays. J Immunol Meth. 2002;263:35–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
99. Dong M, Tepp WH, Johnson EA, Chapman ER. Using fluorescent sensors to detect botulinum neurotoxin activity in vitro and in living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:14701–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
100. Sharma SK, Ferreira JL, Eblen BS, Whiting RC. Detection of type A, B, E, and F Clostridium botulinum neurotoxins in foods by using an amplified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with digoxigenin-labeled antibodies. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:1231–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
101. Liu W, Montana V, Chapman ER, Mohideen U, Parpura V. Botulinum toxin type B micromechanosensor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:13621–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
102. Barr JR, Moura H, Boyer AE, Woolfitt AR, Kalb SR, Pavlopoulos A, et al. Botulinum neurotoxin detection and differentiation by mass spectrometry. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:1578–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
103. Bagramyan K, Barash JR, Arnon SS, Kalkum M. Attomolar detection of botulinum toxin type A in complex biological matrices. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(4):e2041. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
104. Chao HY, Wang YC, Tang SS, Liu HW. A highly sensitive immuno-polymerase chain reaction assay for Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin type A. Toxicon. 2004;43:27–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
105. Mason JT, Xu L, Sheng ZM, O’Leary TJ. A liposome-PCR assay for the ultrasensitive detection of biological toxins. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:555–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
106. Varnum SM, Warner MG, Dockendorff B, Anheier NC, Jr, Lou J, Marks JD, et al. Enzyme-amplified protein microarray and a fluidic renewable surface fluorescence immunoassay for botulinum neurotoxin detection using high affinity recombinant antibodies. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2006;570:137–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
107. Ferracci G, Miquelis R, Kozaki S, Seagar M, Leveque C. Synaptic vesicle chips to assay botulinum neurotoxins. J Biochem. 2005;391:659–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
108. Ahn-Yoon S, DeCory TR, Durst RA. Ganglioside–liposome immunoassay for the detection of botulinum toxin. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2004;378:68–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
109. Wictome M, Shone CC. Botulinum neurotoxins: Mode of action and detection. J Appl Microbiol. 1998;84:S87–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
110. Cherington M. Clinical spectrum of botulism. Muscle Nerve. 1998;21:701–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
111. Glasby C, Hatheway CL. Fluorescent-antibody reagents for the identification of Clostridium botulinum. J Clin Microbiol. 1983;18:1378–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
112. Lilly T, Kautter DA, Lynt RK, Solomon HM. Immunodiffusion detection of Clostridium botulinum colonies. J Food Prot. 1984;47:868–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
113. Ogert RA, Brown JE, Singh BR, Shriver-Lake LC, Ligler FS. Detection of Clostridium botulinum toxin A using a fiber optic-based biosensor. Anal Biochem. 1992;205:306–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
114. Ekong TAN, McLellan K, Sesardic D. Immunological detection of Clostridium botulinum type A in therapeutic preparations. J Immunol Meth. 1995;180:181–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
115. Doellgast GJ, Beard GA, Bottoms JD, Cheng T, Roh BH, Roman MG, et al. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and enzyme-linked coagulation assay for detection of Clostridium botulinum neurotoxins A, B, and E and solution-phase complexes with dual-label antibodies. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:105–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
116. Fach P, Perrelle S, Dilasser F, Grout J, Dargaignaratz C, Botella L, et al. Detection by PCR-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of Clostridium botulinum in fish and environmental samples from a coastal area in northern France. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:5870–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
117. Hallis B, James BAF, Shone CC. Development of novel assays for botulinum type A and B neurotoxins based on their endopeptidase activities. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:1934–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
118. Schmidt JJ, Stafford RG. Fluorigenic substrates for the protease activities of botulinum neurotoxins, serotypes A, B, and F. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:297–303. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
119. Ferreira JL, Handy MK, McCay SG, Baumstark BR. An improved assay for identification of type A Clostridium botulinum using the polymerase chain reaction. J Rapid Methods Automat Microbiol. 1992;1:293–9. [Google Scholar]
120. Campbell KD, Collins MD, East AK. Gene probes for identification of the botulinum neurotoxin gene and specific identification of neurotoxin types B, E and F. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:2255–62. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
121. Szabo EA, Pemberton JM, Desmarchelier PM. Detection of genes encoding botulinum neurotoxins types A to E by polymerase chain reaction. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993;59:3011–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
122. Szabo EA, Pemberton JM, Gibson AM, Eyles MJ, Desmarchelier PM. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Clostridium botulinum type A, B, and E in Food, soil, and infant feces. J Appl Bacteriol. 1994;76:539–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
123. Fach P, Hauser D, Guillou JP, Popoff MR. Polymerase chain reaction for the rapid identification of Clostridium botulinum type A strains and detection in food samples. J Appl Bacteriol. 1993;75:234–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
124. Hielm S, Hyytia E, Ridell J, Korkeala H. Detection of Clostridium botulinum in fish and environmental samples using polymerase chain reaction. Int J Food Microbiol. 1996;31:357–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
125. Aranda E, Rodriguez MM, Asensio MA, Cordoba JJ. Detection of Clostridium botulinum types A, B, E and F in foods by PCR and DNA probe. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1997;25:186–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
126. Lindstrom M, Keto R, Markkula A, Nevas M, Hielm S, Korkeala H. Multiplex PCR assay for detection and identification of Clostridium botulinum type A, B, E, and F in food and fecal material. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:5694–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
127. Lin WJ, Johnson EA. Genome analysis of Clostridium botulinum type A by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:4441–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
128. Hielm S, Bjorkroth J, Hyytia E, Korkeala H. Genomic analysis of Clostridium botulinum group II by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:703–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
129. Hielm S, Bjorkroth J, Hyytia E, Korkeala H. Ribotyping as an identification tool for Clostridium botulinum species causing human botulism. Int J Food Microbiol. 1999;47:121–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
130. Arnon SS, Schechter R, Inglesby TV, Henderson DA, Bartlett JG, Ascher MS, et al. Botulinum toxin as a biological weapon: Medical and public health management. JAMA. 2001;285:1059–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
131. Siegel LS. Human response to botulinum pentavalent (ABCDE) toxoid determined by a neutralization test and by an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;25:2351–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
132. Pittman PR, Hack D, Mangiafico J, Gibbs P, McKee KT, Jr, Friedlander AM, et al. Antibody response to a delayed booster dose of anthrax vaccine and botulinum toxoid. Vaccine. 2002;20:2107–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
133. Byrne MP, Smith LA. Development of vaccine for prevention of botulism. Biochimie. 2000;82:955–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
134. Atassi MZ, Oshima M. Structure, activity and immune (T & B cell) recognition of botulinum neurotoxin. Crit Rev Immunol. 1999;19:219–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
135. Lee JS, Pushko P, Parker MD, Dertzbaugh MT, Smith LA, Smith JF. Candidate vaccine against botulinum neurotoxin serotype A derived from a Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus vector system. Infect Immun. 2001;69:5709–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
136. Byrne MP, Smith TJ, Montegomery VA, Smith LA. Purification, potency and efficacy of botulinum neurotoxin type A binding domain from Pichia pastoris as a recombinant vaccine candidate. Infect Immun. 1998;66:4817–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
137. Bennett AM, Perkins SD, Holley JL. DNA vaccination protects against botulinum neurotoxin type F. Vaccine. 2003;21:3110–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
138. Zeng M, Xu Q, Elias M, Pichichero ME, Simpson LL, Smith LA. Protective immunity against botulism provided by a single dose vaccination with an adenovirus-vectored vaccine. Vaccine. 2007;25:7540–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
139. Xu Q, Pichichero ME, Simpson LL, Elias M, Smith LA, Zeng M. An adenoviral vector-based mucosal vaccine is effective in protection against botulism. Gene Ther. 2009;16:367–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
140. Tackett CO, Shandera WX, Mann JM, Hargrett NT, Blake PA. Equine antitoxin use and other factors that predict outcome in type A foodborne botulism. Am J Med. 1984;76:794–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
141. Francisco AM, Arnon SS. Clinical mimics of infant botulism. Pediatrics. 2007;119:826–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
142. Sugiyama H. Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin. Microbiol Rev. 1980;44:419–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
143. Black RE, Gunn RA. Hypersensitivity reactions associated with botulinal antitoxin. Am J Med. 1980;69:567–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
144. Arnon SS. Creation and development of the public service orphan drug human botulism immune globulin. Pediatrics. 2007;119:785–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
145. Jing Z, Miao WY, Ding FH, Meng JY, Ye HJ, Jia GR, et al. The effect of toosendanin on monkey botulism. J Tradit Chin Med. 1985;5:29–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
146. Shi YL, Wang ZF. Cure of experimental botulism and antibotulismic effect of toosendanin. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2004;25:839–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
147. Shi YL, Li MF. Biological effects of toosendanin, a triterpenoid extracted from Chinese traditional medicine. Prog Neurobiol. 2007;82:1–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
148. Fischer A, Nakai Y, Eubanks LM, Clancy CM, Tepp WH, Pellett S, et al. Bimodal modulation of the botulinum neurotoxin protein-conducting channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:1330–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
149. Boldt GE, Kennedy JP, Janda KD. Identification of a potent botulinum neurotoxin a protease inhibitor using in situ lead identification chemistry. Org Lett. 2006;8:1729–32. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
150. Burnett JC, Ruthel G, Stegmann CM, Panchal RG, Nguyen TL, Hermone AR, et al. Inhibition of metalloprotease botulinum serotype A from a pseudo-peptide binding mode to a small molecule that is active in primary neurons. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:5004–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
151. Kumaran D, Rawat R, Ludivico ML, Ahmed SA, Swaminathan S. Structure and substrate based inhibitor design for Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin serotype A. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:18883–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
152. Silvaggi NR, Wilson D, Tzipori S, Allen KN. Catalytic features of the botulinum neurotoxin A light chain revealed by high resolution structure of an inhibitory peptide complex. Biochemistry. 2008;47:5736–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
153. Cai S, Singh BR. Strategies to design inhibitors of Clostridium botulinum neurotoxins. Infectious Disorders - Drug Targets. 2007;7:47–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
154. Tok JB, Fischer NO. Single microbead SELEX for efficient ssDNA aptamer generation against botulinum neurotoxin. Chem Commun. 2008;28:1883–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
155. Zhang P, Ray R, Singh BR, Li D, Adler M, Ray P. An efficient drug delivery vehicle for botulism countermeasure. BMC Pharmacol. 2009;9:12. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
156. Scott AB. Botulinum injection into extraocular muscles as an alternative to strabismus surgery. Opthalmology. 1980;87:1044–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
157. Scott AB. Botulinum toxin injection of eye muscles to correct strabismus. Trans Am Opthalmol Soc. 1981;79:734–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
158. Lew MF, Adornato BT, Duane DD, Dykstra DD, Factor SA, Massey JM, et al. Botulinum toxin type B: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, safety and efficacy study in cervical dystonia. Neurology. 1997;49:701–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
159. Mezaki T, Kaji R, Kohara N, Fujii H, Katayama M, Shimizu T, et al. Comparison of therapeutic efficacies of type A and F botulinum toxins for blepharospasm: A double-blind, controlled study. Neurology. 1995;45:506–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
160. Maselli RA, Burnett ME, Tonsgard JH. In vitro microelectrode study of neuromuscular transmission in a case of botulism. Muscle Nerve. 1992;15:273–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
161. Ranoux D, Gury C, Fondarai J, Mas JL, Zuber M. Respective potencies of Botox® and Dysport® : A double blind, randomised, crossover study in cervical dystonia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72:459–62. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
162. Sampaio C, Costa J, Ferreira JJ. Clinical comparability of marketed formulations of botulinum toxin. Mov Disord. 2004;19:S129–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
163. Dressler D, Benecke R. Pharmacology of therapeutic botulinum toxin preparations. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1761–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
164. Jost WH, Blumel J, Grafe S. Botulinum neurotoxin type A free of complexing proteins (Xeomin) in focal dystonia. Drugs. 2007;67:669–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
165. Jankovic J. Botulinum toxin therapy for cervical dystonia. Neurotox Res. 2006;9:145–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
166. Simpson DM, Gracies JM, Graham HK, Miyasaki JM, Naumann M, Russman B, et al. Assessment: Botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of movement disorders (an evidence-based review) Neurology. 2008;70:1691–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
167. Frei K, Truong DD, Dressler D. Botulinum toxin therapy of hemifacial spasm: comparing different therapeutic preparations. Eur J Neurol. 2006;13:30–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
168. Naumann M, Jost W. Botulinum toxin treatment of secretory disorders. Mov Disord. 2004;19:S137–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
169. Brin MF, Lyons KE, Doucette J, Adler CH, Caviness JN, Comella CL, et al. A randomized, double masked, controlled trial of botulinum toxin type A in essential hand tremor. Neurology. 2001;56:1523–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
170. Lang AM. Botulinum toxin type A therapy in chronic pain disorders. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:S69–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
171. Schurch B, Schmid DM, Knapp PA. An update on the treatment of detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia with botulinum toxin type A. Eur J Neurol. 2007;6:S83–9. [Google Scholar]
172. Dutton JJ, Fowler AM. Botulinum toxin in ophthalmology. Surv Ophthalmol. 2007;52:13–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
173. Flynn TC. Update on botulinum toxin. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2006;25:115–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
174. Madalinski M, Chodorowski Z. Why the most potent toxin may heal anal fissure. Adv Ther. 2006;23:627–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
175. Ghazizadeh S, Nikzad M. Botulinum toxin in the treatment of refractory vaginismus. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:922–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
176. Thwaini A, Shergill I, Radhakrishnan S, Chinegwundoh F, Thwaini H. Botox in urology. J Int Urogynecol. 2006;17:536–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
177. Song PC, Schwartz J, Blitzer A. The emerging role of botulinum toxin in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders. Oral Dis. 2007;13:253–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
178. Jankovic J, Brin MF. Botulinum toxin: Historical perspective and potential new indications. Muscle Nerve. 1997;20:S129–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
179. Blitzer A, Binder WJ, Aviv JE, Keen MS, Brin MF. The management of hyperfunctional facial lines with botulinum toxin. A collaborative study of 210 injection sites in 162 patients. Arch Otolaryngol. 1997;123:389–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
180. Anderson ER., Jr Proper dose, preparation, and storage of botulinum neurotoxin serotype A. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004;61((22 Suppl 6)):S24–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
181. Hexsel D, Dal’Forno T, Hexsel C, Do Prado DZ, Lima MM. A randomized pilot study comparing the action halos of two commercial preparations of botulinum toxin type A. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34:52–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
182. Singh BR, Thirunavukkarasu N, Ghosal K, Ravichandran E, Kukreja R, Cai S, et al. Clostridial neurotoxins as a drug delivery vehicle targeting nervous system. Biochimie. 2010;92:12532–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
183. Chaddock JA, Purkiss JR, Duggan MJ, Quinn CP, Shone CC, Foster KA. A conjugate composed of nerve growth factor coupled to a non-toxic derivative of Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin type A can inhibit neurotransmitter release in vitro. Growth Fact. 2000;18:147–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
184. Simpson LL. Identification of the characteristics that underlie botulinum toxin potency: Implications for designing novel drugs. Biochimie. 2000;82:943–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Indian Journal of Medical Research are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications